نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (آمیخته )

نویسنده

دکتری مدیریت صنعتی گرایش تحقیق در عملیات ، واحد علوم و تحقیقات ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی مدل شایستگی‌های هوش مصنوعی بر عملکرد سازمانی با در نظر گرفتن قابلیت‌های بازاریابی تجارت به تجارت می‌باشد. روش پژوهش اکتشافی (کیفی ـ کمی) می‌باشد. در بخش کیفی با رویکرد آنتروپی شانون و در بخش کمی توصیفی-پیمایشی لحاظ گردیده است. مشارکت‌کنندگان پژوهش حاضر در بخش کیفی اعضای هیأت علمی ونخبگان هوش مصنوعی و بازاریابی و مدیریت می‌باشد که براساس قانون اشباع نظری با 14 نفر انجام گرفت و در قسمت کمی مدیران اجرایی شهرک‌های صنعتی شمال ایران تعداد آن‌ها 540 نفر بوده که 224 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری انتخاب شدند. ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات در بخش کیفی مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختار یافته و در بخش کمی پرسشنامه محقق ساخته است. روش تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها در بخش کمی آزمون‌های تحلیل عامل تأییدی و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار ‌اسمارت پی آل اس انتخاب شدند. نتایج نشان داد که مکانیزم های شایستگی‌های هوش مصنوعی بر قابلیت‌های بازاریابی تجارت به تجارت و عملکرد سازمانی، تأثیر گذار می‌باشند و همچنین مدل شایستگی‌های هوش مصنوعی بر عملکرد سازمانی با در نظر گرفتن جنبه قابلیت‌های بازاریابی تجارت به تجارت مورد تأیید است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and explaining the model of artificial intelligence competencies on organizational performance considering B2B marketing capabilities

نویسنده [English]

  • meysam karamipour

----PhD in Industrial Management, Operations Research, Department of Science and Research, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Abstract
The purpose of this research is to design a model of artificial intelligence competencies on organizational performance, taking into account business-to-business marketing capabilities. The research method is exploratory (qualitative-quantitative). In the qualitative part, it is considered with the Shannon entropy approach, and in the quantitative part, it is descriptive-survey. The participants of the present research in the qualitative part are faculty members and elites of artificial intelligence and marketing and management, which was conducted with 14 people based on the theoretical saturation rule, and in the quantitative part, the 540number of executive directors of industrial towns in northern Iran, of which 190 were selected as statistics sample. The data collection tool was semi-structured interview in the qualitative part, and researcher made questionnaire in the quantitative part. The method of data analysis was selected in the quantitative part of confirmatory factor analysis tests using SmartPLS software. The results showed that the mechanisms of artificial intelligence competencies have an effect on business-to-business marketing capabilities and organizational performance, and also the model of artificial intelligence competencies on organizational performance is confirmed considering the aspect of business-to-business marketing capabilities.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The huge increase in the amount of data along with access to processing power capabilities and storage space on digital devices, have attracted new attention in the last few years to artificial intelligence in several fields and scientific courses (Enholm et al., 2021). The intense competition among organizations around the world has also accelerated the need to use artificial intelligence to achieve a competitive advantage over competitors (Ransbotham et al., 2018). Most C-level executives do not see AI as a core competency that organizations must employ to remain competitive in the long term (Kietzmann & Pitt, 2020). One of the key areas of using artificial intelligence in organizational activities has been business-to-business marketing (Mikalef et al., 2021). Smart solutions are needed to enhance business-to-business marketing capabilities in a complex business environment, because business-to-business operations are often associated with enormous information complexity and the need to make quick decisions. In this sense, artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize the way of performing common activities due to the ability to process increasing amounts of data and provide rich insights about key business partners and customers (Bag et al., 2021). In addition, it has been stated that artificial intelligence applications enable the automation of many manual processes, and this can help eliminate bottlenecks and increase operational efficiency in business-to-business activities (Paschen et al., 2020). In fact, a recent survey study on corporate executives conducted by Garner showed that the majority believe that artificial intelligence is likely to become a key development in their organization in the next few years (Shin & Kang, 2022).
Therefore, the main questions of this research are: What effect does artificial intelligence competencies have on organizational performance considering the B2B variable? Through what mechanism, the effects of artificial intelligence competencies on organizational performance are realized? And finally, what is the model of artificial intelligence competencies on organizational performance considering the aspect of B2B marketing capabilities?
Theoretical framework
Until now, there is not a complete understanding of how organizations should plan the development of artificial intelligence and turn it into a strategic asset applicable to achieve a competitive advantage. This issue is very evident and prominent in the field of business-to-business marketing, because there is still very little knowledge about the impact of artificial intelligence and the potential mechanisms of value generation from such technologies (Huang et al., 2019). Understanding the value of AI in business-to-business marketing and how to achieve it is critical to reducing the number of failed initiatives within organizations, as well as accelerating the development of AI in these types of operations. Similarly, recent survey studies of industry professionals show that there are still a number of significant bottlenecks preventing the adoption and use of AI that go beyond technical challenges. In addition, from the point of view of many managers, the value of adopting artificial intelligence is still not clear and certain, which prevents its further application in key organizational operations (Bhalerao et al., 2022). A recent study by McKinsey noted that the most popular use cases for AI in organizations relate to optimizing business-to-business marketing and service processes, and this is where respondents placed the most value. However, there are still several challenges associated with realizing such value by investing in AI and specifically with creating an AI competency that can always support business needs (McKinsey, 2022). To address this gap, this study uses the core competence theory (Prahalad, 1993) and provides a definition of the use of artificial intelligence within organizational boundaries, following the key followers of this theory. Especially, we express the concept of artificial intelligence competence as a central competence of organizations, which indicates the need for creative and coordinated use of artificial intelligence. The stated theories explain that organizations able to develop an artificial intelligence competency are organizations that are able to realize a competitive advantage over their competitors; because the application of artificial intelligence is unique in nature and requires comprehensive efforts from various organizational entities to produce artificial intelligence applications difficult to imitate and add value.
Methodology
In the current research, a systematic approach is used. This approach inductively uses a systematic set of procedures to formulate a theory in relation to a phenomenon. Content analysis is one of the documentary methods that deal with the systematic, objective, quantitative and generalizable examination of communication messages. This method is considered a concealer in the classification of methods, and it is used to check the obvious content of the messages in a text, and as a result, it does not enter into the interpretation and semiotics of the message content. The Delphi method is a structured communication method or technique that was originally invented and developed for the purpose of systematic and interactive forecasting by relying on the deliberation of experts. This method used in future research mainly pursues goals such as discovering innovative and reliable ideas or providing appropriate information for decision making. The Delphi method is a structured process for collecting and classifying the knowledge available to a group of experts, which is done through the distribution of questionnaires among these people and the controlled feedback of the answers and opinions received. Research method is fundamental-applied according to the goal; mixed (qualitative-quantitative) of sequential exploratory type according to the type of data; cross-sectional according to the time of data collection; and descriptive-survey according to the method of data collection or the nature and method of the research.
Discussion and Results
According to the results of Shannon's entropy technique for evaluating the capabilities of artificial intelligence, it can be seen that all the dimensions and indicators were higher than the average level of the group's weight, and remain in the model. Therefore, using the results of semi-structured interviews and inspired by the theoretical and empirical literature of the research, the identified categories will be categorized as described in the table below. As mentioned in the previous discussions, the sample size in the qualitative part of the research follows the principle of theoretical saturation, which is reflected in the next table on how to reach theoretical saturation.
Conclusion
The main goal of this research was to design a model of artificial intelligence competencies on organizational performance, considering the aspect of business-to-business marketing capabilities. The research method was exploratory (qualitative-quantitative). It was taken into account with the Delphi technique approach in the qualitative part, and descriptive-survey in the quantitative part. The participants of the present research in the qualitative part were academic faculty members and elites of artificial intelligence and marketing and management, which was conducted with 14 people based on the theoretical saturation rule; and in the quantitative part, 540 people of the industrial managers of the industrial towns in northern Iran, of which 190 people were selected a statistical sample. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative part, and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative part. The method of data analysis was carried out in the quantitative part of confirmatory factor analysis tests using SmartPLS software. One of the goals of this research was to try to understand whether, and under what conditions, artificial intelligence can lead to organizational value for companies. In order to answer this question, we grounded artificial intelligence based on the theory of core competencies. Therefore, the competencies of artificial intelligence were considered from the aspect of one of the key organizational capabilities that has the potential to create a competitive advantage for organizations. Therefore, the competencies of artificial intelligence are not only understood from the technical aspect, but also include management's ability to creatively anticipate applications that add value to the organization and include the ability to experience and test new methods of using artificial intelligence. Also, based on this approach, AI competency is considered as a core competency that organizations should strive to enhance, rather than just an ancillary and auxiliary set of capabilities that can support certain operations.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Artificial intelligence
  • B2B marketing
  • Competencies of artificial intelligence
  • business scope
  • business environment
Telo Hosseini, F, Fard, R, & Ayouzi Heshmat, A. (2022). Presenting the B2B Marketing Maturity Model. Business Management, 14(3), 519-570. doi: 10.22059/jibm.2022.336954.4293. (In persian).
EsKandari, K, and Bigelow, L. (2022). Designing an evaluation model for industrial marketing research (B2B) with an emphasis on organizational purchasing behavior patterns. Marketing Management, 17(54), 69-91. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/410229/fa. (In persian).
Esfidani, M, Ramezani, S and Shah Hosseini, M. (2015). Interpretive structural modeling of organizational brand identity in the B2B market of the IT industry with a view to marketing performance. Business Management, 8(2), 259-280. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/358614/fa. (In persian).
Rejali, S. M. J., Sanyaei, A, and Mohammad Shafiei, M. (2021). A mixed research in the field of seller-buyer relationships in industrial markets (B2B) studied in the supply chain of Iran's oil industry. Business Management, 13(1), 273-303. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/962273/fa. (In persian).
Roosta, A, Jafari Zare, M, & Biranvand, R. (2022). Explaining the role of smart e-marketing on purchase intention with the mediating role of e-entrepreneurship. Advertising and Sales Management, 3(3), 224-235. doi: 10.52547/JABM.748383.2.1. (In persian).
Ahammad, M. F., Tarba, S. Y., Frynas, J. G., & Scola, A. (2017). Integration of Nonmarket and Market Activities in Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions. British Journal of Management, 28(4), 629–648.
 Astrachan, C. B., Patel, V. K., & Wanzenried, G. (2014). A comparative study of CB-SEM and PLS-SEM for theory development in family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 116–128.
 Bag, S., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2021). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge creation and B2B marketing rational decision making for improving firm performance. Industrial marketing management, 92, 178–189.
 Batko, R., & Szopa, A. (2016). Strategic imperatives and core competencies in the era of robotics and artificial intelligence. IGI Global.
Bhalerao, K., Kumar, A., Kumar, A., & Pujari, P. (2022). A Study of Barriers and Benefits of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Small and Medium Enterprise. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 26, 1–6.
 Borges, A. F., Laurindo, F. J., Spínola, M. M., Gonçalves, R. F., & Mattos, C. A. (2020). The strategic use of artificial intelligence in the digital era: Systematic literature review and future research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 102225.
Cavazos-Arroyo, J., & Puente-Diaz, R. (2019). The influence of marketing capability in Mexican social enterprises. Sustainability, 11(17), 4668.
Chahal, H., & Kaur, J. (2014). Development of marketing capabilities scale in banking sector. Measuring Business Excellence.
 Chang, S.-J., Van Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184. A.
Chernov V. Chernova Artificial Intelligence In Managemnet: Challenges And Opportunities. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings 2019 133 140.
Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., & Mikalef, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60, Article 102383.
 Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of marketing, 75(4), 183–195. Dwivedi, Y. K., & Wang, Y. (2022). Guest editorial: Artificial intelligence for B2B marketing:. Farrell, A. M. (2010). Insufficient discriminant validity: A comment on Bove, Pervan, Beatty, and Shiu (2009). Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 324–327.
 Farrokhi, A., Shirazi, F., Hajli, N., & Tajvidi, M. (2020). Using artificial intelligence to detect crisis related to events: Decision making in B2B by artificial intelligence. Industrial marketing management, 91, 257–273.
Fountaine, T., McCarthy, B., & Saleh, T. (2019). Building the AI-powered organization. Harvard Business Review, 63–73.
Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198.
Gomez-P ´ ´erez, G., Martín-Guerrero, J. D., Soria-Olivas, E., Balaguer-Ballester, E., Palomares, A., & Casariego, N. (2009). Assigning discounts in a marketing campaign by using reinforcement learning and neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 8022–8031.
 Gummesson, E. (2014). The theory/practice gap in B2B marketing: Reflections and search for solutions. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.
Guo, H., Xu, H., Tang, C., Liu-Thompkins, Y., Guo, Z., & Dong, B. (2018). Comparing the impact of different marketing capabilities: Empirical evidence from B2B firms in China. Journal of Business Research, 93, 79–89.
Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14.
Hair, J. F., Jr, Sarstedt, M., Matthews, L. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: part I–method. European Business Review, 28(1), 63–76.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152.
 Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
Herhausen, D., Mioˇcevi´c, D., Morgan, R. E., & Kleijnen, M. H. (2020). The digital marketing capabilities gap. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 276–290.
Huang, M.-H., Rust, R., & Maksimovic, V. (2019). The feeling economy: Managing in the next generation of artificial intelligence (AI). California Management Review, 61(4), 43–65.
 Kamboj, S., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Marketing capabilities and firm performance: Literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
Kietzmann, J., & Pitt, L. F. (2020). Artificial intelligence and machine learning: What managers need to know. Business Horizons, 63(2), 131–133. Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM (pp. 245–257).
Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications. Kolis, K., & Jirinova, K. (2013). Differences between B2B and B2C customer relationship management. Findings from the Czech Republic. European Scientific Journal, 4, 22–27.
 Kumar, N., Stern, L. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651.
 Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228.
 Liu, G., Eng, T. Y., & Takeda, S. (2015). An investigation of marketing capabilities and social enterprise performance in the UK and Japan. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 267–298.
Lu, Y., & Ramamurthy, K. (2011). Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: An empirical examination. MIS Quarterly, 35(4), 931–954. Lundin, L., & Kindstrom, D. (2023). Digitalizing customer journeys in B2B markets. Journal of Business Research, 157, Article 113639.
Makarius, E. E., Mukherjee, D., Fox, J. D., & Fox, A. K. (2020). Rising with the machines: A sociotechnical framework for bringing artificial intelligence into the organization. Journal of Business Research, 120, 262–273.
 Mariadoss, B. J., Tansuhaj, P. S., & Mouri, N. (2011). Marketing capabilities and innovation-based strategies for environmental sustainability: An exploratory investigation of B2B firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1305–1318.
McKinsey. (2022). The state of AI in 2022—and a half decade in review. https://www. mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2022-anda-half-decade-in-review.
Mikalef, P., Conboy, K., & Krogstie, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence as an enabler of B2B marketing: A dynamic capabilities micro-foundations approach. Industrial marketing management, 98, 80–92.
Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, Online. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434.
Morgan, N. A., Vorhies, D. W., & Mason, C. H. (2009). Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8), 909–920.
 Nair, S. R., Demirbag, M., Mellahi, K., & Pillai, K. G. (2017). Do parent units benefit from reverse knowledge transfer? British Journal of Management.
Ongsulee, P. (2017). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning. 2017 15th international conference on ICT and knowledge engineering (ICT&KE).
Paschen, J., Kietzmann, J., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for market knowledge in B2B marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. Paschen, J., Wilson, M., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020). Collaborative intelligence: How human and artificial intelligence create value along the B2B sales funnel. Business Horizons, 63(3), 403–414. Pattinson, S., Nicholson, J. D., Ehret, M., Velu, C., & Ryan, P. (2022). Innovation ecosystems in B2B contexts: Owning the space. In: Elsevier.
 Pietronudo, M. C., Croidieu, G., & Schiavone, F. (2022). A solution looking for problems? A systematic literature review of the rationalizing influence of artificial intelligence on decision-making in innovation management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, Article 121828.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
 Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623–656.
Raghupathi, H., Choudhury, D., & Sfeir, C. J. (2023). Application of Artificial Intelligence in Market Knowledge and B2B Marketing Co-creation. In Machine Learning for Business Analytics (pp. 107–115). Productivity Press.
Rahman, M. S., Hossain, M. A., & Fattah, F. A. M. A. (2021). Does marketing analytics capability boost firms’ competitive marketing performance in data-rich business environment? Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(2), 455–480.
 Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210.
 Ransbotham, S., Gerbert, P., Reeves, M., Kiron, D., & Spira, M. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Business Gets Real. MIT Sloan Management Review.
 Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring the relationships between IT competence, innovation capacity and organizational agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27 (1), 22–42.
 Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH.
 
 Rusthollkarhu, S., Toukola, S., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Mahlamaki, ¨ T. (2022). Managing B2B customer journeys in digital era: Four management activities with artificial intelligence-empowered tools. Industrial Marketing Management, 104, 241–257.
Saini, A., Grewal, R., & Johnson, J. L. (2010). Putting market-facing technology to work: Organizational drivers of CRM performance. Marketing Letters, 21(4), 365–383.
 Santos-Vijande, L., Sanzo-P´erez, M., Trespalacios Guti´errez, J., & Rodríguez, N. (2012). Marketing capabilities development in small and medium enterprises: Implications for performance. Journal of CENTRUM Cathedra: The Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(1), 24–42.
 Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqu´es, D. (2021). Setting B2B digital marketing in artificial intelligence-based CRMs: A review and directions for future research. Industrial Marketing Management, 98, 161–178.
Sharma, S., Islam, N., Singh, G., & Dhir, A. (2022). Why Do Retail Customers Adopt Artificial Intelligence (AI) Based Autonomous Decision-Making Systems? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
 Shin, S., & Kang, J. (2022). Structural features and Diffusion Patterns of Gartner Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence using Social Network analysis. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 28(1), 107–129.
Singh, H. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in strategic marketing: Value generation and mechanisms of action NTNU].
Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Wamba, S. F., Kamdjoug, J. R. K., & Wanko, C. E. T. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: The business value of AIbased transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893–1924.
 West, B., Hillenbrand, C., Money, K., Ghobadian, A., & Ireland, R. D. (2016). Exploring the impact of social axioms on firm reputation: A stakeholder perspective. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 249–270.