نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کمی)

نویسندگان

1 گروه مدیریت، واحد علی اباد کتول، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، علی اباد کتول، ایران

2 گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد علی آباد کتول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی آباد کتول، ایران

3 گروه حسابداری، واحد علی اباد کتول، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، علی اباد کتول، ایران

4 گروه حسابداری، واحد علی آباد کتول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی آباد کتول، ایران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی منافع و مخارج مالی زنجیره تامین پایدار در شرایط عدم قطعیت در شرکت‌های تولیدی پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران می‌باشد. این پژوهش از نظر هدف کاربردی، از نظر نحوه جمع‌آوری داده‌ها به شکل کیفی و از نظر روش اجرای پژوهش با رویکرد فراترکیب می‎باشد. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل پنج پایگاه داده به زبان انگلیسی شامل اسکوپوس، امرالد، ساینس دایرکت، اسپرینگر و پروکوئست و دو پایگاه داده به زبان فارسی شامل پایگاه نشریات کشور و پایگاه اطلاعات علمی جهاد دانشگاهی می‌باشد. روش تحلیل بصورت تحلیل محتوا می باشد. تعداد 30 مقاله و 210 کد و 24 مفهوم از مقالات انتخاب شده استخراج شد که شامل قابلیت فرآیند مدیریت فرآیند سفارش، قابلیت فرآیند مدیریت ارتباط با مشتری، قابلیت فرآیند مدیریت تقاضا، ظرفیت و قابلیت فرآیند مدیریت منابع، زمان عرضه به بازار، اعتبار خریدار، پلتفرم‌های الکترونیکی، هماهنگی و همکاری در زنجیره تامین برای بهبود عملکرد خدمات، همگام سازی تصمیمات مربوط به مالی، اشتراک اطلاعات نوآورانه مرتبط با مالی، قابلیت فرآیند مدیریت ارتباط با تامین کننده، قابلیت فرآیند مدیریت عملکرد خدمات، تعامل بین بخشی شرکت‌های زنجیره تامین, تامین مالی موجودی، نوآوری محصول، فاکتورینگ معکوس، همسویی انگیزشی جریان نقدی، سرمایه در گردش زنجیره تامین، اعتبار بانکی برای تامین مالی زنجیره تامین، یکپارچه‌سازی تامین‌کننده، مدیریت بازیافت، ریسک اختلال زنجیره تامین، مدیریت حمل و نقل زنجیره تامین، تغییرات در برآوردها و مبنای آنها به‌عنوان منابع و مخارج زنجیره تأمین پایدار در شرایط عدم قطعیت می باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Financial benefits and costs,sustainable supply chain,conditions of uncertainty,manufacturing companies.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein Ali Samiei 1
  • Ahmad Mehrabian 2
  • Majid Ashrafi 3
  • Ali Khamaki 4

1 Department of Management, Aliabad Katul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katul, Iran

2 Department of Industrial Management, Aliabad Katul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katul, Iran

3 Department of Accounting, Aliabad Katul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katul, Iran

4 Department of Accounting, Aliabad Katul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katul, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is to identify the financial benefits and costs of sustainable supply chain under conditions of uncertainty in manufacturing companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. In terms of practical purpose, in terms of exploratory nature, and in terms of data collection method, this research was conducted qualitatively and with meta-composite method. The statistical community was formed in the metacomposite approach, including the articles available in Emerald, ProQuest, Absco, Science Direct, Springer, Scopus, IranDoc, Iran Mag databases. In the qualitative part, through library studies and with a metacombination approach, the financial benefits and expenses of the sustainable supply chain were extracted and categorized under conditions of uncertainty, and the initial model was proposed. Concepts of order process management process capability, customer relationship management process capability, demand management process capability, capacity and resource management process capability, time to market, buyer credit, electronic platforms, supply chain coordination and collaboration to improve service performance, synchronization Financial decisions, innovative information sharing related to finance, supplier relationship management process capability, service performance management process capability, supply chain companies' partial interaction were named and classified in the category of "sustainable supply chain financial benefits". Concepts of inventory financing, product innovation, reverse factoring, cash flow incentive alignment, supply chain working capital, bank credit for supply chain financing, supplier integration, recycling management, supply chain disruption risk, supply chain transportation management, changes in The estimates and their basis were named and classified under the category of "Sustainable Supply Chain Financial Expenditure".
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Changes in the field of industry are happening on a wider level and at a faster pace than in the past. This trend, along with issues such as globalization, rising customer expectations, and strict environmental and social laws governing industrial and economic activities, has increased the level of competition in the market for providing services and products and the issue of sustainability in the supply chain (Sheikh Sajadieh & Bahmani Tabrizi, 2020). As a result of increasing society's knowledge about the sustainability of government policies and increasing society's awareness, sustainability performance is increasingly becoming an important organizational strategy. One of the approaches to improve organizational performance is through supply chain sustainability. This approach affects the company's competitiveness and supply chain performance (Govindan et al, 2016).
Today, uncertainty is one of the major problems and challenges in supply chain management, and one of the reasons for its emergence is the lack of definitive and accurate information, as well as the dynamics and complexity of supply chain components. Uncertainty can be defined as the difference between the amount of information required to perform a task and the amount of information that is actually available. In supply chain planning decision processes, uncertainty is an important factor that can affect the efficiency and effectiveness of supply chains (Hasanpur et al, 2021).
Therefore, the researcher asked the main question: what are the financial benefits and expenses of the sustainable supply chain in the conditions of uncertainty in manufacturing companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange?
Theoretical framework
Supply chain
Supply chain is defined as "a set of functional activities (transportation, inventory control, etc.) that are repeated many times along the flow channel, by which raw materials are transformed into finished products and value, and arrive into the hands of the consumer". Since today's globalization has opened new markets and intensified competition, organizations have been able to reduce production costs by developing more complex supply chains to compete in the global market (Kamalahmad & Mrllat-Parast, 2016).
Sustainable supply chain management
Sustainable supply chain management provides economic, social and environmental requirements in the flow of materials and services between suppliers and customers. The structure of sustainable supply chain management is considered as a prerequisite for sustainable success, and the design of that structure provides a competitive advantage for companies. There are several reasons why organizations should integrate environmental and social goals in the supply chain (Msgaard et al, 2013).
Vidal et al, (2022) investigated the pressure of supply chain stakeholders to adopt sustainable supply chain practices: examining the role of entrepreneurial and sustainability orientations. The results showed that both entrepreneurial orientation and sustainability orientation simultaneously act as moderators of the effect of supply chain stakeholder pressure on the adoption of socially and environmentally sustainable supply chain management practices. However, entrepreneurial orientation only attracts companies so far in adopting supply chain management practices. When a strong sustainability orientation is in effect, higher practice acceptance occurs but the effect of stakeholder pressure is weakened.
Stephens et al, (2022) investigated the relationship between supply chain disruption orientation and supply chain flexibility and market performance with the stimulus-organism-response model. The results showed that organizational culture plays an important role in the development of supply chain flexibility in the midst of supply chain dynamics. Market performance is also developed, but only through supply chain flexibility. A supply chain disruption orientation alone does not improve market performance. The mediating effects highlight the importance of a supply chain disruption orientation; a strategic orientation that enhances an organization's ability to develop supply chain flexibility.
Research methodology
This research is applicable in terms of purpose, qualitative in terms of data collection, and exploratory in terms of nature, and meta-composite research in terms of research implementation method. The statistical population of the research was selected from five databases in English, including Scopus, Emerald, Science Direct, Springer, and ProQuest; and two databases in Farsi, including the National Journals Database and the Academic Jihad Scientific Information Database, which contain a large number of sustainable supply chain journals. The analysis method is content analysis.
Research findings
In the meta-composite method, first the introduced databases were searched using key words and terms, and all the articles were collected in a spreadsheet file based on the relationship of the article title with them. The analysis method is content analysis. 30 articles, 210 codes, and 24 concepts were extracted from the selected articles. The results showed the capability of the order process management process, the capability of the customer relationship management process, the capability of the demand management process, the capacity and capability of the resource management process, time to market, buyer credit, electronic platforms, coordination and cooperation in the supply chain to improve service performance, Synchronization of financial decisions, sharing of innovative information related to finance, supplier relationship management process capability, service performance management process capability, supply chain interdepartmental interaction as sustainable supply chain benefits under uncertainty and inventory financing, product innovation, reverse factoring, incentive alignment of cash flow, supply chain working capital, bank credit for supply chain financing, supplier integration, recycling management, supply chain disruption risk, supply chain transportation management, changes in estimates and their basis as sustainable supply chain costs in conditions Uncertainties were identified.
Conclusion
The aim of the current research is to identify the financial benefits and expenses of the sustainable supply chain under conditions of uncertainty in manufacturing companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. The results of this research are in agreement with the results of Stephens et al, (2022), Negri et al, (2021), Dwivedi et al, (2021), Scaramuzzi et al, (2020), Liu et al, (2019), Zarei et al, (2022), Hassanpour et al, (2021), Vidal et al, (2022), Wagner, (2021), and Ding et al, (2017).
Vidal et al, (2022) confirmed that supply chain performance can be improved by facilitating longer payment terms for buyers and better access to financing for suppliers. However, the adoption of sustainable financing may be questionable due to conflicts between stakeholders.
According to the obtained results, the following suggestions were presented:
- According to the component of changes in estimates and their basis, which is considered the most important component, companies should consider changes in political, cultural, consumer behavior, economic and other issues.
- Smart transportation systems and new technologies should be used for faster and cheaper delivery. Also, the use of these types of systems can help greening the chain.
- In order to satisfy the customers and increase the quality of the products, the active companies in the industries should use the ideas of the customers in the development of new products and ask their opinions about the products and their changes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Financial benefits and costs
  • sustainable supply chain
  • conditions of uncertainty
  • manufacturing companies
Abdul-Kader, W. and Shaik, M., (2014) " Green supplier selection generic framework: A multi attribute Utility theory approach”, “International Journal of Sustainable Engineering”, 4 (1), 37-56.
Bavarsad, B. & Rahimi, F. & Salimi Fard, A. & Kalambar, M. (2017). Investigating the impact of social capital on the performance of Mehr Ekhetaz banks in Khuzestan province from the employees' point of view. Social Development Quarterly, Volume: 11, Number: 3, https://civilica.com/doc/1575765. (In Persian. (
Bokrantz, J., & Dul, J. (2022). Building and testing necessity theories in supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12287
Caiado, R.G.G., & de Freitas Dias, R., & Mattos, L.V., & Quelhas, O.L.G., & Leal Filho, W., (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency-A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 165, 890–904
Das, D. (2017). Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance. Vol. 164. 1344-1362. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.006
Ding, Y., & Lu, D., & Fan, L. (2017). How China’s demand uncertainty moderates the respondence of operational performance to supply chain integration in automotive industry. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1318465. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1318465
Dwivedi, A., Agrawal, D., Jha, A. et al. (2021) Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 22, 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00288-4
Fasihi, M., & Najafi, S. E., & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., & Hahiaghaei-Keshteli, M. (2021). Cold-water farmed fish chain supply chain network design considering uncertainty conditions: A case study of trout supply chain network in Mazandaran. Industrial Management Studies, 19(63), 1-50. doi: 10.22054/jims.2021.60904.2657. (In Persian. (
Fayzinia, V. (2015). Project evaluation under conditions of uncertainty using mathematical and graphical analysis methods, 11th International Project Management Conference, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/620702. (In Persian. (
Esfahani Zanjani, M., & Najafi, A., & Naghilo, A., & Mohammadi, N. (2020). Meta-Analysis of Supply Chain Sustainability and Risk Management Issues. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 12(23), 217-254. doi: 10.22034/bar.2020.11611.3008. (In Persian. (
Foroughi, D., & Kia, H. (2022). Design of a Pharmaceutical supply chain under uncertainty and reverse logistic. Journal of Transportation Research. doi: 10.22034/tri.2022.221600.2737. (In Persian. (
Hassanpour, H. A.,& Taheri, M. R., & Mikaeli, F. (2022). Designing a food supply chain network based on customer satisfaction under uncertainty. Journal of Business Administration Researches, 13(26), 395-431. doi: 10.22034/bar.2022.14142.3563. (In Persian. (
Hendijani, R., & Saeidi Saei, R. (2020). The Impact of Supply Chain Integration and Demand Uncertainty on Firm Performance. Industrial Management Studies, 18(59), 1-45. doi: 10.22054/jims.2021.45200.2360. (In Persian. (
Ghadri, H. & Taghdarian Ardakan, A. & Fatuhi Ardakani, H. & Karimi Zarchi, M. (2019). Presenting a structural model of sustainable supply chain management in companies with multiple businesses (case study: Shahid Ghandi Manufacturing Industries Company), the fourth international conference International Industrial Management, Yazd, https://civilica.com/doc/937896. (In Persian. (
Govindan, K., Seuring, S., Zhu, Q., & Azevedo, SG. (2016). Accelerating the transition towards sustainability dynamics into supply chain relationship management and governance structures. Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 112. 1813-1823.DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.084
Ganbold, O., & Matsui, Y. (2017). Impact of environmental uncertainty on supply chain integration. The Journal of Japanese Operations Management and Strategy, 7(1), 37-56. DOI:10.20586/joms.7.1_37
Kamalahmadi, M., & Mellat-Parast, M. (2016). Developing a resilient supply chain through supplier flexibility and reliability assessment. International Journal of Production Research, 54(1), 302-321.
Karimi, F., & Haghighat Monfared, J., & Keramati, M. (2022). The effect of strategic supply chain management on the performance and orientation of the supply chain by analyzing the mediating role of resilience (A case study of the offshore sector of the oil industry). Journal of value creating in Business Management, 2(3), 61-81. doi: 10.22034/jbme.2023.367725.1040. (In Persian. (
Khan, M. A., & Ahmad, S. F., & Irshad, M. (2022). Quantifying the Mediating Effect of Resilience in Supply Chain: Empirical Evidence from Oil and Lubricant Industry. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 3(2), 213-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2022(3-II)21
Khalili, S. M., Pooya, A., Kazemi, M., & Fakoor Saghih, A. M. (2022). Designing a Sustainable and Resilient Gasoline Supply Chain Network under Uncertainty (Case study: Gasoline Supply Chain Network of Khorasan Razavi Province). Industrial Management Journal, 14(1), 27-79. doi: 10.22059/imj.2022.334524.1007896. (In Persian. (
Kianfar, K., & Barforoush, N. (2016). Effect of Entrepreneurial Supply Chain and New Product Development on Efficiency of Companies: Case Study inBeverage Industry. Journal of Executive Management, 8(15), 75-92. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/150886/en. (In Persian. (
Liao, S.H., Kuo, F.I., Ding, L.W., (2017). Assessing the influence of supply chain collaboration value innovation, supply chain capability and competitive advantage in Taiwan's networking communication industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 191, 143–153.
Liu, W., & Liu, Y., & Chen, L., & Si, C., & Long, S. (2019). Relationship among demand updating, decision-making behaviours and performance in logistics service supply chains: an exploratory study from China. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22(4), 393-418.
Luthra, S., Mangla, S. K., Xu, L., & Diabat, A. (2016). Using AHP to evaluate barriers in adopting sustainable consumption and production initiatives in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 342-349.. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.04.001
Meftahi, H., & vafaee, F., & Namamian, F., & vaise, S. (2019). Designing a Comprehensive Model of Entrepreneurial Opportunity Window In the supply chain using meta-synthesis method. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 12(3), 421-440. doi: 10.22059/jed.2019.285314.653074. (In Persian. (
MOHAMMADI, M., & SOLEIMANI, H. (2020). Investigating Open Loop and Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Uncertainty (Case Study: Iran Teransfo Company). JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVE (JIMP), 10(2 (38), 33-53. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/385767/en. (In Persian. (
Mosgaard, M, & Riisgaard, H., & Huulgaard, R.D. (2013). Greening non-product-related procurement e when policy meets reality. Journal of Clean Production. Vol.39. 137-145.DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.018
Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30 (7), 2858– 2886. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2776
Nouri, M., & Mohammadi, E., & Jabalameli, M.S.. (2019). Sustainable Supply Chain Design with Considering Uncertainty in Suppliers’ Risk. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH IN PRODUCTION SYSTEMS (IERPS), 4(14), 105-122. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/241321/en
Ramanian, M. R., & heydarnia kohan, P. (2012). Factors affecting green supply chain management in tourism industry, Investigation of Tehran’s Tour & Travel Agencies. Tourism Management Studies, 5(14), 125-151.DOI: 20.1001.1.23223294.1389.5.14.5.7. (In Persian. (
RASHIDI, H., & Keramati Zanganeh, M., & Ghamari, F. (2019). Investigating the mediating role of value creation in the relationship between supply chain participation and performance in organization. ANDISHEH AMAD, 18(69), 61-87. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/380261/en. (In Persian. (
Rezghi Rostami, A., & Hosseini, M., & Askari, A., & Farshidi, A. (2015). The role of technological innovation on sustainable supply chain performance based on the type of company activity. Decision Engineering Quarterly. 2(5). 166-URL: http://jde.khu.ac.ir/article-1-68-fa.html150. (In Persian. (
Tseng, M.L., Wu, K.J., Hu, J.Y., (2018). Decision-making model on sustainable supply chain finance in uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 205, 30–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.024
Salmannejad, M., & Mirghafoori, S. H., & Andalib Ardakani, D., & Mirfakhredini, S. H. (2022). Hospital Supply Chain Optimization under Uncertainty: Application of Fuzzy Goal Programming. Journal of Industrial Management Perspective, 12(Issue 1, Spring 2022), 161-191. doi: 10.52547/jimp.12.161. (In Persian. (
Scaramuzzi, S., & Belletti, G. & Biagioni, P. (2020). Integrated Supply Chain Projects and multifunctional local development: the creation of a Perfume Valley in Tuscany. Agric Econ 8, 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-019-0150-8
Sheikh Sajadieh, M., & Bahmani Tabrizi, M. (2020). Suppliers Development Model for Supply Chain Sustainability: A Case Study. Research in Production and Operations Management, 11(1), 45-69. doi: 10.22108/jpom.2020.118896.1217. (In Persian. (
Stephens, A. R., & Kang, M., & Robb, C. A. (2022). Linking Supply Chain Disruption Orientation to Supply Chain Resilience and Market Performance with the Stimulus–Organism–Response Model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(5). Retrieved from doi:10.3390/jrfm15050227
Vidal, N.G., & Spetic, W., & Croom, S. & Marshall, D. (2022), "Supply chain stakeholder pressure for the adoption of sustainable supply chain practices: examining the roles of entrepreneurial and sustainability orientations", Supply Chain Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-08-2021-0370
Wagner, S.M. (2021), "Startups in the supply chain ecosystem: an organizing framework and research opportunities", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 51 No. 10, pp. 1130-1157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2021-0055
Wang, M., & Jie, F. (2020). Managing supply chain uncertainty and risk in the pharmaceutical industry. Health services management research, 33(3), 156-164. DOI:10.1177/0951484819845305
Wang, L., Luo, X. R., Lee, F., & Benitez, J. (2021). Value creation in blockchain-driven supply chain finance. Information & Management, 103510. doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103510.
Zarei, M., & Nasrollahi, M., & Yousefli, A. (2022). Developing a closed-loop green supply chain network design in uncertain space. Journal of Modeling in Engineering, 20(68), 165-187. doi: 10.22075/jme.2021.23524.2099. (In Persian).